Search
Close this search box.

2016 NCAA Tournament “Points From The Title” Ratings

2016 NCAA Tournament “Points From The Title” Ratings

April 4, 2016 – by David Hess

A lot of our work at TeamRankings focuses on combining accurate predictions with game theory concepts in order to produce logically-sound, data-driven strategies for office pool contests. That work depends on creating accurate predictive power ratings, which often means taking into account other predictive systems and betting market info.

But the 2016 NCAA tournament just ended. It’s time for play, not work.

In that light, here are our 2016 NCAA Tournament “Points From The Title” Ratings.

The idea behind these ratings is to show how much better a team’s performance would have had to been in order to win the title, if we make one very big assumption:

If the losing team in a game had actually won, they’d have performed exactly like the winning team in future rounds.

Obviously that’s not realistic, but it allows us to chain together results from multiple rounds in order to get a single number that represents for how far from the title each team in the tournament was.

Here’s an example to illustrate what we mean: (delete the ones related to the losing team)

Kansas lost to Villanova by 5. So they needed to score 6 more points (or allow 6 fewer points) in order to beat Villanova. That puts them 6 points from the title.Connecticut lost to Kansas by 12. So they needed to score 13 more points to beat Kansas. They also inherit Kansas’s previous 6 points from the title. Altogether, that puts them 19 points from the title.

As you might expect, Oklahoma — and the entire West region — doesn’t look very good by this metric. That’s what happens when a regional champ gets blown out in the Final Four.

2016 NCAA Tournament “Points From The Title” Ratings

Here’s the full list of all 68 2016 NCAA Tournament teams. Remember, as in golf, lower numbers are better.

Rank Team Points Away
1 Villanova 0
2 North Carolina 4
3 Kansas 6
4 Notre Dame 19
4 Connecticut 19
6 Indiana 20
6 Iowa 20
8 Stephen F. Austin 21
8 Florida Gulf Coast 21
8 Temple 21
11 Syracuse 22
12 Maryland 23
13 Providence 24
13 Miami-Florida 24
15 Wisconsin 25
16 Gonzaga 26
16 Southern California 26
18 Kentucky 27
18 Michigan 27
18 Colorado 27
21 Xavier 29
21 Virginia 29
21 South Dakota State 29
24 Pittsburgh 30
25 NC-Asheville 31
26 Buffalo 32
27 Tulsa 33
27 Wichita St. 33
27 Austin Peay 33
30 West Virginia 36
31 Hawaii 37
32 Butler 38
33 Dayton 42
34 Iowa St. 43
34 Seton Hall 43
36 Arizona 44
37 Oklahoma 45
38 Chattanooga 46
39 Weber St. 48
39 Middle Tennessee St. 48
41 Texas Tech 49
41 California 49
43 Utah 50
43 VCU 50
45 Fairleigh Dickinson 53
46 Vanderbilt 54
47 Stony Brook 56
48 Iona 57
49 Michigan St 58
49 Oregon 58
51 Oregon St. 59
52 Texas A&M 60
52 Cal. State – Bakersfield 60
54 Arkansas-Little Rock 61
54 Northern Iowa 61
56 Fresno St. 62
56 Purdue 62
58 St. Joseph’s 64
59 Texas 65
60 Hampton 66
61 Cincinnati 67
62 Duke 73
63 Yale 81
64 NC-Wilmington 82
65 Baylor 86
66 Green Bay 88
67 Holy Cross 98
68 Southern 103

If you liked this post, please share it. Thank you! Twitter Facebook

NFL Football Pool Picks NFL Survivor Pool Picks NCAA Bracket Picks College Bowl Pool Picks College Football Pool Picks NFL Picks NBA Picks MLB Picks College Football Picks College Basketball Picks NFL Predictions NBA Predictions MLB Predictions College Football Predictions College Basketball Predictions NFL Spread Picks NBA Spread Picks MLB Spread Picks College Football Spread Picks College Basketball Spread Picks NFL Rankings NBA Rankings MLB Rankings College Football Rankings College Basketball Rankings NFL Stats NBA Stats MLB Stats College Football Stats College Basketball Stats NFL Odds NBA Odds MLB Odds College Football Odds College Basketball Odds A product ofTeamRankings BlogAboutTeamJobsContact

© 2005-2024 Team Rankings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Statistical data provided by Gracenote.

TeamRankings.com is not affiliated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA®) or March Madness Athletic Association, neither of which has supplied, reviewed, approved or endorsed the material on this site. TeamRankings.com is solely responsible for this site but makes no guarantee about the accuracy or completeness of the information herein.

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Share the Post:

Related Posts